|
The actions to get on with climate change is based on the assumption that mankind is responsible for change of climate |
|
This assumption must be reconsidered since the part of CO2 –emissions of mankind is – due to science-reports – too small. |
|
Scientists are reporting (reference see graphs below) of 2-3% CO2 emissions of the world are caused by mankind. |
|
But, the caprices of the sun with its sun spots are causing up to 98% of the emissions. |
|
Mankind can only reduce emissions within the tolerance of the measurements. Results are completely insignificant for climatic control. |
|
Shouldn't we follow science?? |
|
There is climate change since earth began. |
|
The world-wide discussion of the causes of the climatic change is guiding mankind to considerate use of resources |
|
Science is drawing the attention of mankind to the fact that predominantly the caprices of the sun are causing vast CO2 -emissions of the seas, of biosphere, of lithosphere, of kryosphere and of atmosphere... |
|
Scientifically less engaged mankind believes, however, that the indications of the climatic change are caused predominantly by mankind. This assumption is being eagerly supported by politicians. |
|
But: Mankind – due to scientific measurements – is only responsible for 2 -3% of CO2 emissions. (See graphics below). The main consequences lie in the complex interrelations between sun and the spheres of the earth. |
|
The eagerness of people and of the European politicians to seek responsibility for change of climate end up in inconsiderate management such as Bilderstürmerei (iconoclastic actions). Politicians discovered: It brings image successes starting actions to the CO2 -minimising. |
|
Such eagerness of the politicians has, nevertheless, its merits because of results in well-considered management of resources. |
|
All media are blunder-bussing this way: Humans should be kept consciousness of debt. Manipulation of data |
|
But in the Cretaceous Period there was also change of climate. There was neither mankind nor automotives. USA is following the world policy reluctantly. |
|
Natural history of the species is showing: Mankind is only a guest on Earth... As a guest one should behave well considered. |
|
Pictures of politicians facing calving glaciers are very impressive. |
|
Pictures of politicians, petting last polar bear babies are very impressive. |
The Facts

I
Further research at the University of Pennsylvania

Quelle: http://www.carleton.edu/departments/geol/
(These passages will be translated only by the Authors themselves)
Interpretation von Leinfelder und Seyfried (University Stuttgart - Geology)
Das zeigt klar, dass nicht die Hominiden am Klimawandel schuld sind, sondern unsere Natur. Die antropogenen Emissionen belaufen sich derzeit auf ca. 22 GT CO2/Jahr. oder ca. 5,5 GT C/Jahr. Diese Menge ist im Bereich des statistischen Fehlers der Schätzungen des Gesamtgleichgewichts von 210 GT C/Jahr und ca. 3%. Eine solch kleine Menge kann das Gesamtgleichgewicht nicht stören, da die Gleichgewichte ohne Umschlagspunkte verschoben werden (Löslichkeit, Photosynthese) und die Bodenausgasungen
Authors Leinfelder and Seyfried of Stuttgart University report similar figures as Carleton: 22 Giga-tons CO2 per year = 3 % emitted by mankind and of 220 Giga-tons per year as whole output of CO2. This small part of mankind-caused emission cannot influence the balance.
Schlußfolgerungen (Leinfelder/Seyfried)
Die aus der Erdgeschichte zu ziehenden Lehren sind zahlreich. Die erste Lehre ist eine Lektion in Bescheidenheit: Meeresspiegelschwankungen und die damit verbundenen klimatischen Veränderungen sind Bestandteil eines Regelkreises, in dem Lithosphäre, Hydrosphäre, Kryosphäre, Biosphäre und Atmosphäre vernetzt sind. Die Wechselwirkungen zwischen den steuernden Faktoren und die autozyklische Natur gewisser Vorgänge sind so komplex, daß sie im Augenblick allenfalls qualitativ beschrieben werden können. Jeder Eingriff in dieses System erhöht das Risiko einer chaotischen Reaktion.(= bold-print by forum-gap).
Every interference to influence the balance can end up with the risk of a chaotic result.
Links
http://www.geologie.uni-stuttgart.de/edu/msp/msp_pop3.html
http://www.carleton.edu/departments/geol/
http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=503867
http://www.geosc.psu.edu/~dbice/DaveSTELLA/entrance.htm